From: Timothy Lane
O.K., bus fans - let's see how cost effective these
new-fangled Hybrid Buses might be.
A typical 40 foot diesel bus might use ~ 400 litres of
diesel fuel per day.
The hybrid bus is expected to save 33% of the fuel
that a regular bus would use.
But that would only be on routes like the #2 or #18,
milk runs with many stops where the bus never goes faster
than about 60 km/hr.
Experience in other cities show that when used on high
speed express runs, the hybrid shows no, or next to no,
fuel savings.
But let's, as I usually am, be generous.
33% less fuel is a reduction of ~132 litres per day.
Times 365 days per year is 48,180 litres saved per year.
Times $1.00 per litre (fuel will average more than that, in
the near future, but let's just use that round number for now)
= $48,180 per year in saved fuel costs.
The hybrid bus costs about four times what a regular bus costs.
So, if a regular, run of the mill, bus runs you about $500,000,
then you spend $1,500,000 more to avail yourself of a hybrid.
$1,500,000 divided by $48,180 fuel cost savings per year
requires ~31 years to pay back the extra cost of the bus.
Sorry, but the bus is only expected to last about 15 years.
Don't look too cost effective to me.
Then again, if fuel goes to $2.00 per litre, it might work out.
:>)
Tim
Wrong calculation
When I saw your comment i thought that can't be right,so I did some investigating.
I am not sure where you got your $1,500,000 from but it doesn't seem right. Why would a Hydro bus be so much more expensive? After all, it's almost the same bus, just a slightly different engine.
According to http://ottawastart.com/story/8402.php one of those new Hybrid busses comes in at $650,000, which would make them profitable in 3 years, if I assume everything the same you did. Sounds a lot better, and if fuel prices go up again then it would be even more so.
I'm not saying that is better or worse than a train, but your comment that comes across like "We don't need Hybrid busses because they never pay off" is not correct in my opinion.
In fact, I think it is the way to go, to harvest the energy that a moving vehicle has while breaking and to reuse it for accelerating. Besides that, they're then more quiet and environmentally friendly.
Unfortunately we cannot have O-trains everywhere, so busses (and perhaps trams?) are necessary. And if Hybrid busses offer a combination of flexibility while still being relatively fuel efficient, then I'm all for it.
Cheers
Martin
more from Tim Lane
Ott:
C Below.
Tim
Ottawa LRT wrote:
> Hybrids are relatively new and rare technology for buses. Other than
> old diesel-electrics (with the overhead wires) I am pretty sure that
> Hamilton's transit system used diesel as well.
>
Hamilton used trolley buses, which are straight electrics - no diesel engine.
My brother, a bus driver for HSR (Hamilton Street Railway - yes, they still
call their transit system by that name, 50 years after streetcars disappeared)
took me on his trolley bus when I visited him years ago.
The trolley buses are now gone, of course, from Hamilton.
One of the main reasons fro getting rid of them was that
HSR wanted to model their system after Ottawa's, where
bus meander all over the place, and routes change every
6 months.
That's hard to do with trolley wires.
Also, your system exudes more "pizzazz" in your employee
list has a whole phalanx of university educated route planners,
rather than a gaggle of trade school overhead wire maintainers.
:>)
Now, just to complicate things, there are a very few examples
of dual mode (NOT "hybrid") trolley buses around.
Seattle Washington uses diesel-electric dual mode buses.
In their downtown transit tunnel, the bus driver raises his poles,
shuts off the diesel engine, and travels electrically through the
tunnel.
Outside the tunnel, the poles are lowered, and the bus proceeds
dieselly (is that a word? - My spell checker thinks not!)
And, to complicate things further, Seattle also has diesel-electric
HYBRID buses, where a small diesel engine runs a generator to
charge a battery bank.
The bus travels on the power from the battery, which turns
electric motors to drive the wheels.
When braking, the electric motors become generators, to
charge the battery.
That way, you recover some of the energy that would be otherwise
wasted as heat in the brakes.
This energy is released from the battery to help the bus get going
again, or to climb hills.
This system is ideal for a bus that makes frequent starts and stops,
such as the #2 here in "Disneyland on the Rideau".
The problems arose in Seattle when they tried to use these hybrids
on long, fast express runs.
The little diesel engine was not powerful enough to run the bus
at a constant, high speed, as there was not enough power available
to charge the battery.
As a result, the engines were strained, the battery ran down,
and the fuel mileage was no better than the regular diesel buses,
with their larger engine.
So, if OC Transpo gets similar buses here, we will be VERY
disappointed with their performance, unless they are restricted
to milk runs.
Of course, under the FOTO plan, more TRAINS will be
used to cross the wide wasteland known as the "Greenbelt",
and more of the buses WILL be restricted to what they do
best - milk runs.
Therefore, the FOTO plan provides a good justification
for getting hybrid buses, and using them where they would
do the most good.
- What a concept!
:>)
Volunteer researcher, Friends of the O-train.
Great search on trains
wow i like your search and how you work on trains and their consumption its rally great i was also looking to make some comprehensive report on trains and their consumption during traveling but i got busy in my business of managed hosting services along with the windows hosting services at affordable price now i am going to start linux hosting services which are quite reliable and affordable, one thing i must say that your work is awesome and as you make your search very clear and attractive, it was really good t read you.
can't say.......
I can't say whether it is better or worse than a train, but the comment that comes across 70-642 as "We do not need hybrid buses, because they do not pay" is wrong in my opinion.
In fact, I think that this is the 1z0-050 way to harvest the energy of a moving vehicle, while breaking and re-accelerate 000-071. Besides the fact that they then have a quiet and environmentally friendly.