Transit agency continues to ignore trunk and feeder model, despite continuing failures of current system

The article that started this:

OTTAWA -- An internal e-mail, obtained by the Citizen, lays bare OC Transpo's contingency plans for cutting service on select routes to deal with day-to-day problems that may arise such as unexpected staff shortages.

The e-mail suggests that any one of 40 or so routes could be affected by a service change at any given time.

The transit system's website may show that bus service is normal while a bus that usually runs every 15 minutes may suddenly and temporarily appear only every half hour. The next day, it might be back to normal while service on another route is stretched out from every six to every 12 minutes.

Even transit managers won't know from day to day which routes need to be cut or for how long, the e-mail says.

The internal memo asks supervisors to switch around the cuts so that no single route suffers all the inconvenience.

Transit service design staffer Paul Siedl wrote in the e-mail dated Sept. 3, "here is a list of runs that could be cancelled by Transit Operations on a day-to-day basis which will minimize the impact to on-street service.

"The list contains 22 additional runs for the morning peak and 26 more runs for the afternoon peak. ... If the list needs to be used, please rotate through the runs so that the same trips do not get cancelled each and every day," Siedl went on to write.

"The trips on this list are not being removed from the planned schedule and public information. They may be cancelled occasionally by Transit Control depending on the available resources on a particular day. Again, we avoided premium-fare express routes, rural express routes, school routes, employment routes, first and last trips, and consecutive trips on a particular route.

"Please forward to those who need to know. Thanks."

Mike Aldrich, acting head of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 279, says abrupt changes such as are proposed in the e-mail would be disastrous for riders and drivers alike.

"As far as I'm concerned, the public needs to know. If a member of the public looks (at the website), it's going to show you that the 64 leaves at 6:50 a.m. so you say, 'oh great, I have to be downtown by 7:30, so
that's the bus I'm going to take.' You go out to take that bus at 6:50, but it's not going to show. It's cancelled but they don't let the public know.

"They don't want any waves during the (Oct. 25 municipal) election," said Aldrich.

"They are trying to hide everything from everybody. That's why they have these, what I call, secret lists."

Angry passengers will yell at the drivers that they're late, but in fact, they are right on time -- the time that managers had set, Aldrich said. Recently, union members voted 61 per cent against a proposed agreement that would have resolved key points of contention, including scheduling.

Laurie Blackstone, OC Transpo's manager for transit operations, says Aldrich has misunderstood. She said in an e-mail: "Such lists have been a part of normal operating procedures for years.

"These e-mails do not mean these routes and runs were not done. They simply show we had a plan to adjust operations if we had needed to."

As to notifying the public, she said: "Whenever we feel a service change will impact riders unduly, we will issue notices via several channels, including but not limited to, social media."

Beyond that, the service is going smoothly, with the most of the 9,000 plus trips on time, she said.

Comments

I've been thinking for

I've been thinking for awhile that OC Transpo should create a "dummy route" - the #90 - that would run in the morning peak period.

Its eastern terminus would be Hurdman; its western terminus Lincoln Fields.

The idea is that inbound express buses could flag themselves as this route the moment they got onto the 'Transitway', or at least once they were onto the part where anyone is allowed to board them at regular fares.

That means that all express buses from Barrhaven and Kanata and also the local red routes would be flagged as the #90 when they went through Westboro. The only buses with different numbers would be the other 80- and 90-series routes.

If this were the regular way of operating, then when there is some kind of bus crunch the short route 95s could be pulled out for other duties, as Tim explained, while the point at which an express becomes a #90 would be moved outwards to compensate for the reduction in 95s.

David

Volunteer researcher, Friends of the O-train.

Focus on the trunk: it is where the system is most flexible

This is so dag-burned STOOOPID!!!

The runs that should be cancelled when they are short of buses, should be, first and foremost, on the
#95 route.

It has by far the highest frequency of service, they NEVER stick to anything remotely resembling a
SCHEDULE, and NO ONE will notice if the next one is a NO-SHOW.

Next would be the #96 and #97.
But, ONLY the #95's & 97's that do PART of the route.

I.E., NOT the ones that go all the way to Trim (95) or Barrhaven Marketplace (95), or to the Airport (97).

In addition, Transpo could announce, on short-of-buses days, that ALL morning express buses will be signing up
(for example) #95 Hurdman or #95 Blair (for eastbound buses) and #95 (or #97) Lebreton or #95 (or #97) Lincoln Fields (for westbound buses) as soon as they enter the Transitway on their trip to downtown.

The drivers will be instructed that, regardless of complaints coming from the coddled 'burbanites sitting behind them,
their bus WILL be stopping to pick up other members of the great army of the unwashed, as it proceeds downtown.

Geeze!

Is it THIS hard for Transpo to come up with a better solution?

One that is EXPONENTIALLY simpler than the nonsense described below?

:>)
Tim
Volunteer researcher, Friends of the O-train.