Gatineau busway must link with light rail

Re: STO explains why buses alter route, Aug. 3.
Letters, Ottawa Citizen, Aug 7, 2007

Reading Tony Cote’s column on why Société de Transport de l’Outaouais
buses often divert from their routes really hit home because I have
also experienced these abrupt route changes when taking STO buses from
Gatineau to Ottawa. With Wednesday’s tragic collapse of an expressway
bridge in Minneapolis and then Gatineau’s refusal to consider a
light-rail link with Ottawa, important truths are staring us in the
face.

Why do STO buses change routes across the Ottawa River? Let’s be clear:
it’s to maintain schedules along the congested King Edward, Rideau,
Wellington corridor that they use. It was never designed to handle the
dozens of peak-hour STO buses that use it. Will the planned
$100-million investment in Rapibus by Gatineau improve matters? No, it
can’t, because the Rapibus busways will end near Les Terrasses de la
Chaudière and not provide any additional capacity across the Ottawa
River or in Ottawa.

The Rapibus project has received no attention in Ottawa to date. For it
to make any sense, it must link with lightrail transit service across
the Prince of Wales railway bridge to a location near the Lac Leamy
casino, as proposed by Friends of the O-Train and the mayor’s task
force on transportation. And yet, inexplicably, Gatineau doesn’t want
to even talk about it.

The tragedy in Minneapolis, coupled with last year’s roadbridge
collapse in Laval, remove the veil. We’re faced with a transportation
infrastructure crisis, with our excessive reliance on roads, cars, and
trucks a major part of the problem. Add in the agreed need to reduce
greenhouse-gas emissions and improve air quality, and the message for
residents and governments in Ottawa and Gatineau is blunt and clear:
The O-Train light-rail transit service must be extended quickly across
the Prince of Wales railway bridge into Gatineau, and the STO bus
network oriented around this service.

And as for the much-discussed new bridge across the Ottawa River, let’s
focus on using and maintaining the six we already have, including the
Prince of Wales railway bridge, currently unused for either freight or
transit less than a mile from Parliament Hill.

DAVID GLADSTONE, Ottawa, Founder, Friends of the O-Train

its always feels great to

its always feels great to know someone from somewhat different perspective. I am really happy to see this post right after completing projects 646-230 and 642-533. I'll have to start 000-973 in some time and I want to enjoy this free time as much as possible.

OC Transpo is the urban transit service

OC Transpo is the urban transit service of the City of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. OC Transpo routes also provides service to the downtown core of the nearby city of Gatineau, Quebec, especially during rush hour. OC Transpo currently has a fleet of 991 buses (as of December 31, 2006) that run on regular streets, of which roughly 713 are fully accessible. shared web hosting and the vast majority of regular routes are now served by low-floor buses. There is also a dedicated roadway bus rapid transit system known as the Transitway along with the services of small business web hosting.
OC Transpo utilizes many articulated buses to provide service along with the ecommerce hosting and some of the routes that run on the Transitway, including the city's most-used bus routes, are served almost exclusively by articulated buses.

The framers of the

The framers of the Constitution created a bicameral 83-640 Congress primarily as a compromise between those who felt that each state, since it was sovereign, should be equally represented, and those who felt the Legislature must directly represent the People MB2-631, as did the House of Commons in Britain. There was also a desire to have two Houses that could act as an internal check on each other. One was intended to be a "People's House" directly elected by the People MB2-632, and with short terms obliging the representatives to remain close to their constituents. The other was intended to represent the states to such extent as they retained their sovereignties not expressly delegated to the national government. The Senate is thus not intended to MB2-633 represent the people of the United States equally. The Constitution provides that the approval of both chambers is necessary for the passage of legislation.